The advantages of given retrospective facts are indisputable, it gives opportunity to colour the true events, to give them brighter patterns, to emphasize and to put the right accents, pursuant to ideology and politics working in real time..
In case of “Khojaly case” the given methodic is applied extremely merciless. However, with some mistakes and without proper connection to concept dictated by current political situation, which brings to conflict because of previously published materials or personal propagandistic clichés.
At that time, in 1992, when the memory was freshand the opportunities to do immediatesurveyto create lists of survivors and the dead, it wasn't done. In these days, 20 yearslater, after this tragedy, Azerbaijan has started to make up for lost opportunities before – filling the white spots by questioning events witnessesand participants, named Khojaly. The movies started to shoot, started to take out so called “some archive” documents and to record eyewitnesses accounts.
One of the modern propagandistic art specimen is the “ATV International” television channel movie “There, Where the Sun Died Out”, positioned as documentary.
We intend tostop on one fragmentof this movie. Relates, “Survived khojalian woman”:
Armenians shot my husband, Elmar Akhmedov…
Considering, that full list of dead names was published by Azerbaijan long time ago, than the only right action for clarifying, presented by moviemakers and “witnesses”– is to watch, if there is a man with that name and surname.
Thus, in the list, that was published as long ago as 1992 by Khava Mamedova in the book “Khojaly: Shakhids and Shekhids” under the number of 126 was really listed Elmar Akhmedov. However, there is only one problem – for the date of 26 February 1992 mentioned Elmar Akhmedov was only 6 years old.
In the same list of Khava Mamedova is also listed Akhmedov Eldar Naib oglu, who quite matches by the age as somebody’s husband. However, the set of questions appear:
1) Doesn't really wife know, what is her husbands' name, confusing and named him Elmar not Eldar?
2) Or this falsification was made in the far 1992, when these lists were created and adult sexually matured man, husband and father could have been presented as 6 years old boy, with the purpose to extend children dead list?й?
Evidently, the rhetorical issues nobody will be going to analyze and try to give FACTS in accordance with each other. It is important to state only one fact, that we are witnesses thereof that how are being legalized myths and take place mass consciousness usual manipulation in counting on, that nobody won’t be going to read, compare and analyze.
The propaganda differs from science, that works on audience emotional perception and categorically rejects rational analyzes attempts.